GRAND RAPIDS PRESS: MetroPCS withdraws requests for cellular antennas on GR steeple, school chimney. Click here to read the story on MLive.com This is an excellent story and very encouraging. In summary, MetroPCS wanted to place cellular antennas atop a church steeple and school chimney. The city planning requirements in Grand Rapids required MetroPCS to camoflouge these antenna. MetroPCS stated that doing so would diminish the effectiveness of the antennas, and had intended to appeal on this basis. It now appears that they will reevaluate the need for the new antennas. ![]() This photo may provide some context for the Grand Rapids request. This photo depicts 3 new MetroPCS antennas atop the apartment building at 550 W. Crosstown Parkway in Kalamazoo. As in Grand Rapids, MetroPCS had to seek a dimensional variance in order to install the antennas. Minutes of the June 11, 2009 meeting of the Kalamazoo Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) indicate that MetroPCS felt their "application conform[ed] to the wireless section of the ordinance," and that it "appli[ed] to the spirit of the ordinance" as well. The "wireless section" that he referred to is 4.2W in the zoning ordinance. Paragraph 4 of that section deals with requirements related to collocating antenna(s) on existing structures. It specifically requires that "the color of antennas blends with with existing structure and surroundings." Take a look at the photo. The antennas were painted to match the color of the brick. MetroPCS represented that their new antennas atop this building would conform to the letter and spirit of the ordinance. You be the judge. Did they keep their promise? I want to be clear on this. I beleive the ZBA acted in good faith as it relates to the ordinance and to MetroPCS. I also beleive that MetroPCS did not live up to this good faith, as is evidence by the ramshackle appearance of their new antennas at 550 W. Crosstown Parkway. The minutes of the June 11 ZBA meeting also indicate that : 44 notices were sent to nearby residents Nobody sent any response in opposition nobody spoke in opposition Compare this with what happend in Grand Rapids. People spoke up in opposition. The Press picked up the story, and MetroPCS recognized the wisdom in withdrawing their application. I applaud their decision, and I call upon MetroPCS to make the same wise decision regarding their application for variance at 1609 Whites Rd in Kalamazoo. Earlier today I asked the question, how many towers/antennas could there be within 4.0 miles of the Kalamazoo Country Club at 1609 Whites Rd. Curiousity got the best of me, so I looked. I want to encourage you to see for yourself. You can do this at www.antennasearch.com. Best of all, it's free. Here is what I found after I entered the address. According to AntennaSearch, there are a total of 93 towers and 373 Antennas within 4 miles of the proposed site! Best of all, the proposed MetroPCS tower already shows up on the map! They must be very confident indeed. Click here to see the proposed MetroPCS tower depicted at AntennaSearch. MetroPCS in the news...Grand Rapids 10/19/2009
MetroPCS is making waves in Grand Rapids too! It seems they are interested in bolting antenna on the outside of several prominent church steeples in the Grand Rapids area. There is a great article in the Grand Rapids Press. Cick here to read it. Among other things, the article points out the fact that MetroPCS is committed to a cheaper antenna technology that requires twice as many antennas as other providers. I want to re-emphasize the importance of innovation. If cities didnt require phone companies to install their phone lines in an orderly fashion, cell phones may never have been invented! Mr. Harger's article also includes a link to a very interesting site: www.antennasearch.com. Using the site, he found a total of "570 antennas sending and receiving signals for cell phones, radios and pagers within a 4-mile radius of [Grand Rapids] City Hall." I wonder how many antennas there are within a 4 mile radius of the Kalamazoo Country Club? |

RSS Feed